Teleophthalmology-Enabled Direct Vitreoretinal Surgery Listing from Community Optometric Practice: Enhanced Efficiency During Coronavirus Disease 2019, and Beyond?


Introduction

The pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has created challenges for the practice of ophthalmology.1 It has created a situation where clinicians are weighing the risk to sight with the risk to life. At all times, society recognizes the need to minimize the risks and protect patients and health care workers. On March 23, 2020, in an effort to contain the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) the UK government announced a lockdown and instructed all people to stay at home except for limited and specific circumstances, including the provision of emergency medical care.2 To this end, the Royal College of Ophthalmologists recommended that all routine ophthalmic outpatient clinics and surgery should be postponed.3

Since then, the UK government announced a phased exit from lockdown.4 Underpinning the exit from lockdown and easing of restrictions is safety and virus containment throughout. In the current phase of lockdown, maintaining social distancing and avoiding unnecessary travel remain key priorities. Ophthalmology departments now face challenges running busy clinics while maintaining social distancing. Finding ways to reduce unnecessary patient contact and triage appropriately has become increasingly important.5 There is a need to continue to provide optimal care while maintaining social distancing, avoiding unnecessary patient contact, and reducing patient travel. Ophthalmology services can be connected and streamlined through live teleophthalmology to create a more efficient system where patients are appropriately directed to the correct ophthalmic center.6,7

Typical of most systems, the ophthalmology care provided in Scotland and the United Kingdom is served by secondary care hospitals, with some subspecialist ophthalmic care provided at tertiary ophthalmology centers. Within the West of Scotland, vitreoretinal (VR) surgery provision is out of National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde’s Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow. This VR service provides care to remote Scottish islands and district general hospitals of surrounding towns. NHS Forth Valley serves a population of ∼320,000 within Central Scotland, with ophthalmology services provided from a community hospital. Before COVID-19, the typical patient journey would involve initial presentation to community optometrist or emergency department, who would refer on to the local district general on-call consultant ophthalmologist, who typically appoint urgently (on the same, or next working day within 24 h). Here a diagnosis would be made, and onward referral to tertiary center providing VR cover only if required.

After lockdown, NHS Forth Valley benefitted from service redesign and setup of peripheral Emergency Eye Care Treatment Centers (EETCs), 1 center/100,000 population.8 These centers were staffed by optometrists attending to patients with potential emergency presentations. If required, the primary care provider can connect/refer to an ophthalmologist, establishing an audiovisual link in real time, with teleophthalmologists on-call on a separate rota covering office hours, and the on-call consultant answering video calls out-of-hours.

Methods

Each EETC benefitted from a live teleophthalmology setup through a video slit lamp, or adapted slit lamp with mobile device optics interfacing with the slit lamp oculars.6 Attend Anywhere® is a web-based software that enables patient consultation remotely and securely, accessible to patient/clinician through computer or mobile device. Within the NHS in Scotland, NHS Near Me is the remote consultation solution. NHS Near Me is powered by Attend Anywhere, which has been procured for this use. Attend Anywhere benefits from functionality that allows multiple clinicians to join a consultation from any location, when invited by the clinician leading the consultation. In addition to the patient, optometrist, and local teleophthalmologist in the video consult, the VR surgeon is invited through e-mail or SMS directly from the Attend Anywhere platform, joining the consult as a fourth party. This ability increases the application of videoconferencing by enabling multiple clinicians at different sites to contribute to the management and care of a patient inside a dedicated virtual clinical environment, at the point of presentation, when urgent intervention is felt indicated. Being able to communicate with colleagues/patient with high-fidelity visualization enables “face-to-face” communication, as well as multimodal imaging, informing surgical planning, enhancing teamwork and collaboration. After the consult, Webropol® (Helsinki, Finland) survey was used to collect data from the receiving ophthalmologist, including questions related to quality of communication and management (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Workflow demonstrating traditional pre-COVID referral pathway (top panel) versus post-COVID live teleophthalmology-enabled direct VR surgery listing pathway (bottom panel). COVID, coronavirus disease; OCT, optical coherence tomography; VR, vitreoretinal.

Ethics approval was not required after consultation with local research and development, with established teleophthalmology setup as part of the regional COVID-19 response. Informed consent was obtained from all parties for engagement in the teleophthalmology service.

Results

During the lockdown from March 23 to June 16, 2020, five referrals were taken for suspected retinal detachment, one for submacular hemorrhage.

In 5/6 (83%) of these referrals, the ophthalmologist dialed in the VR surgeon. These patients were listed directly for operation and avoided having to attend the local ophthalmology department. Moreover, they avoided a review in the VR clinic, and were seen on the day of the operation only (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of Referrals Taken

DIAGNOSIS DISTANCE FROM OPTOM TO GGH (MILES) PREOPERATIVE VA TYPE OF SURGERY POSTOPERATIVE VA (ETDRS LETTERS) TIME FROM REFERRAL TO SURGERY
Right submacular hemorrhage 34 HM 23G PPV + subretinal tPA + Lucentis + SF6 under subtenons 25 21 h 46 min
Left macula on superonasal RD 34 6/12 + 2 25G PPV + cryo + SF6 under subtenons Re-detached. Pending review 30 h 22 min
Left mac off inferotemporal RD 35.2 6/30 Left 25G PPV + cryo + laser + C2F6 under subtenons 70 25 h 17 min
Right macula off RD 35.2 Unknown PPV + cryo + gas under LA 50, PH 55 3 h 7 min
Left macula just off temporal RD 34 6/18 + 2 PPV + cryo + C2F6 under GA Pending review 25 h 13 min

From the ophthalmologist viewpoint, on a 5-point Likert grading scale, the quality of the communication was 5/5 for sound, video, and connection reliability in all cases. From the optometrist viewpoint, the quality of the communication for sound and video was 5/5 on a 5-point Likert grading in 5/6 referrals, and 3/5 rating in 1 referral. The connection reliability was given 5/5 rating in all instances, from the optometrist viewpoint. Overall satisfaction and recommendation to others was 5/5 in all instances, as reported by patients, optometrists, and ophthalmologists (Table 2).

Table 2. Mean Satisfaction Results on 5-Point Likert Scale for 6 Referrals

  PATIENT OPTOMETRIST OPHTHALMOLOGIST
Overall, how satisfied are you with the consultation? 5 5 5
How likely would you be to recommend this type of video consultation to a friend or family member/colleague? 5 5 5
How satisfied were you with the quality of the communication?
 Sound   4.6 ± 0.8 5
 Video   4.6 ± 0.8 5
 Connection reliability   5 5

Discussion

In the management of retinal detachment, using live teleophthalmology to connect a receiving ophthalmologist to on-call VR team avoids a review in clinic locally, and allows listing directly for surgery from the community. This also reduces unnecessary patient travel.

Before COVID-19, diagnosis would need to be made in person by an ophthalmologist before referral. It is reasoned that this would avoid false positive referrals, although in this study it was possible to confidently make a diagnosis and list for surgery in all cases where a VR surgeon was dialed in. Without a live feed of the slit lamp view, referring directly to VR surgery based on a phone description risks unnecessary significant patient travel and potential delay in treatment. It is necessary for an ophthalmologist to make a diagnosis locally before referring to VR surgery. Advantages from the perspective of the VR surgeon include a “face-to-face” communication with the patient, counseling regarding preferred anesthetic, and direct visualization of the extent of detachment, as well as guiding the attending optometrist during indirect ophthalmoscopic visualization of the causative retinal breaks ± extent of posterior vitreous detachment, allowing surgical planning at the point of remote examination. There may have been patients presenting with retinal detachment directly to the emergency department, or to their local general practitioner, and this study does not capture those cases.

Conclusion

This is the first use of teleophthalmology described to connect the patient, optometrist, local ophthalmologist, and tertiary ophthalmologist in a synchronous (live) manner. Use of teleophthalmology has benefit to streamline ophthalmology services, particularly in the management of retinal detachment where surgical care is provided in tertiary centers. This use can be extended to other services provided by tertiary centers to avoid unnecessary patient contact locally. Potential exists for a national subspecialist teleophthalmic workforce to more effectively streamline patients toward specialist interventions.

Authors’ Contributions

Each author contributed to this research and article preparation. F.R.G. drafted the article, did substantial contribution to data collation, and approved the final version of the article; S.D.O. did substantial contribution to data gathering and project design, and approved the final version of the article; G.M. did substantial contribution to data gathering and approved the final version of the article; and I.A.T.L. did substantial contribution to conception and design, critically revised the draft article for important intellectual content, and approved the final version of the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following individuals for their efforts in data collection: Andrew Ferguson, Consultant Ophthalmologist; Fatima Shams, Vitreoretinal Fellow; Harold Hammer, Vitreoretinal Consultant; Linda Hunter, LA Hunter Optometrists; Naomi Scott, Erskine Eyecare; and Scott Busby, Erskine Eyecare.

Disclosure Statement

No competing interests exist for all the authors.

Funding Information

This study was supported by the Technology Enabled Care Fund, Scottish Government.

REFERENCES





Source link